Australias far-right marches have gone from working-class rage to white nationalist delusion.Tom Tanukireports.

THE SECOND MARCHfor Australia had around 85 per centless attendees than the first.Im not interested in undervaluing my opponents ability to draw a crowd, and Ill be the first to agree that many people underestimated the crowd sizes from the first round.They were huge.

Give me a margin of error because I didnt have aerial footage from each rally, so lets say the October marches dropped in size from around 80-90 per cent.Thats an enormous decline for an official follow-up to an event that had been widely recognised as the launch of the largest anti-immigration rallies in Australias history.

After the second March for Australia, all the eyes were on the counter-protest in Melbourne after a VicPolpress conferencewhere VicPols CommanderWayne Cheesmantheatrically dumped out a box full of rocks and emoted about how badly behaved the left were.

I wont use this space to debate the chorus of far-right folk insisting I and my ilk be declared as proscribed terrorists because of Cheesmans rock collection.

Right-wing marches are little more than angry parades, but they are effective recruitment systems designed to attract interest for growth.

(I shared my own concerns about those rocks, for what its worth.I also had concerns about the overwhelming brutality of VicPol, concerns echoed by the Melbourne Activist Legal Service. See my video for those remarks.)

I have devoted the bulk of my time to assessing the Marches themselves, instead.Thats because I felt that by avoiding doing this, we all did the March organisers a big favour.

One of the benefits that theyre afforded by the public ignoring the march in favour of Cheesmans rocks, particularly after all the mainstream attention the first round enjoyed, is we dont get to discuss significant developments in the tenor of the march this time round.

The other benefit is that nobody is thinking about exactly why theyve shrunk so much.

I think the first, most obvious reason, is the dominating National Socialist Network (NSN) presence at 31 Augustmarches, which scared crowds away from attending on 19 October.

Their brutal violence at Camp Sovereignty did much of that work.

But we also ran a successful information campaign exposing coordinated neo-Nazi management stacking, media and crowd manipulation strategies used to either capture the Marches or, at least, lend the impression to the medias cameras that theyd been captured despite their size. I did that with my written and video work, The Age did some excellent work, and many activists contributed too.

On the left were always told we call everyone a neo-Nazi.(Ive always taken umbrage with that as an anti-fascist; I know what a neo-Nazi is and I use it as a description, not an insult.)But the evidence of neo-Nazi infiltration and capture of the March was too clear even for the rights brain-rot culture warriors. National and state organisers let NSN take the mic, marshal the rallies, lead the marches, conduct the chants, kick non-white people out of the marches and more.

I received several messages in private from 31 August attendees sharing their sense of having been misled.Mark Aldridge, the Adelaide organiser of the 31 August march, wound up attending the 19 October counter rally.

We got the message over the line, for once, and it contributed significantly to the reduction in crowd size.

I discovered another reason for the marchs reduced size when reviewing the footage. The 19October showed that the march organisers and speakers have more or less abandoned the rising working-class frustrations that were successfully tapped, and directed towards immigration, by the first marches.

Documentarian whatsdoinmedia gave avoiceto these perspectives by interviewing people in the crowd at the first march.Scobie discovered people overwhelmed by rental payments they simply couldnt keep up with, cost-of-living frustrations and so on.

It may have been the case that several of the speakers they were listening to were trying to speak to them about the merits of the White Australia Policy, but simpler working-class struggles had led many of them to attend.

This time, however, most of the speeches stood out to me as being marked by a desire to appeal to nostalgia for theWhite Australia Policy, a desire to protect the (white) founding stock of the nation, and appeals to white ethnonationalism.

Thats all national organisersBec Walkerand Jesse Stewart focused on in their speeches at Sydneys March.

Melbournes lead organiser Matt Trihey, a neo-Nazi, spent his entire speech ostensibly complaining about white genocide and the Great Replacement, all neo-Nazi conspiracy theories.

In Canberra, Reclaim-era talking head Shermon Burgess, now a Nazi, took the mic.(Hes also been a flag-cape patriot, and a Viking, and a Muslim. But now hes a Nazi again.)

Rising inequality is being exploited byright-wing populism, putting Australians at risk of becoming furtherdisenfranchised.

Perth organiser Bailey Bergroth did the same in his speech, invoking the common neo-Nazi blood and soil phrase at the end.

Lachlan Dade, a former Libertarian Party candidate, having shifted completely by the second march to making hammy attempts to appeal to white supremacists, also tried to mention blood and soil.But he accidentally misphrased it as blood and bone, a type of fertiliser.Oops!Try again, Lachlan!

This time, it stood out to me more on the rare occasion that someone did attempt to speak to genuine working-class concerns.

One speaker in Adelaide, for example, spoke about his wife having a stroke and his difficulty in securing DSP payments for her.I sensed his frustration and felt for him. The crowd was silent.

Then he said,meanwhile, immigrants come here and [] they get all these handouts. The crowd cheered at that part.

I gathered that for the 15 per centwho remained for the second march, it became okay to focus mainly on white supremacist matters, detached from any real working-class matters.Demographic replacement, as they call it (or rather, again, the neo-Nazi Great Replacement theory).The inherent criminal tendencies in non-white races, diluting the purity of white Australia.

The crowd lapped it up.The other 85 per cent, who were in large part motivated by a misdirected desire to express their frustrations about working-class matters, did not show up.

The third march is planned for 26 January, and I wouldnt dare to predict after the success of the first round how theyll do. Theres a lot of rage and despair among struggling working-class people; organised racists, guided by our ruling class, are having a field day misdirecting this rage towards immigrants and Indigenous people.So we on the left need to be strategic, and be ready.

But for now, it seems the march has already abandoned its own purported concerns in favour of ideology and various paranoias typical to the organised racist.

Tom Tanukiis an IA columnist, writer, satirist and anti-fascist activist whose weekly videos commenting on the Australian political fringe appear onYouTube. You can follow him/X@tom_tanuki.

Related Articles

• Allowing the far-right to spearhead anti-immigration protests helped Big Australia
• Don't blame migrants for the housing crisis, blame the millionaires
• 'March for Australia' is not common-sense patriotism its a Nazi-led mobilisation